1999 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
Volume 47 Number 3, March 1999

A Phase-Control Approach for a Large-Element Coherent Microwave Power Uplink System

Page 487.

Abstract:

Signal combining efficiencies of 98% have been achieved on low-earth orbiting (LEO) debris with phase-locking of time-overlapped radar pulses from a two-element phased-array consisting of two 34-m beam waveguide steerable paraboloid antennas separated by 204 m. The uplink arraying at 7.19 GHz has been achieved for tracks from about 10° elevation at signal rise to 4° elevation at signal set under varying weather conditions (e.g., hail falling on one antenna). The typical root mean square (rms) phase error for two coherent 100-µs 50-Hz 5-kW peak pulses reflected from LEO debris with signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) > 23 dB is less than 4°. The phase-control system design, methods of calibration, and details of the design control table of phasing error contributors are presented and discussed. Based upon the measured performance, we predict that transmitting antennas for the Deep Space Network (DSN) could be coherently arrayed for up to hours at a time given static phase error calibrations on exo-atmospheric debris. Applications for this technique include low-cost implementation of high-power microwave transmitters for deep-space communication and radars for exploration of other planets and as part of a defense against comets and asteroids.

References

1. R. K. Crane, "Fundamental limitations caused by RF propagation," in Proc. IEEE, vol. 69, pp. 196-209, Feb. 1981.
2. S. D. Slobin, "Microwave noise temperature and attenuation of clouds: Statistics of these effects at various sites in the United States, Alaska, and Hawaii," Radio Sci., vol. 17, pp. 1443-1454, Nov./Dec. 1982.
3. Treuhaft and G. E. Lanyi, "The effect of the dynamic wet troposphere on radio interferometric measurements," Radio Sci., vol. 22, pp. 251-265, 1978.
4. A. D. Goldfinger, "Refraction of microwave signals by water vapor," J. Geophys. Res., vol. 85, no. C9, pp. 4904-4912, Sept. 1980.
5. M. C. Thompson, F. E. Marler, and K. C. Allen, "Measurement of the microwave structure constant profile," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. AP-28, pp. 278-280, Mar. 1980.
6. T. E. VanZandt, J. L. Green, K. S. Gage, and W. L. Clark, "Vertical profiles of refractivity turbulence structure constant: Comparison of observations by the sunset radar with a new theoretical model," Radio Sci., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 819-829, Sept./Oct. 1978.
7. H. Ottersten, "Atmospheric structure and radar backscattering in clear air," Radio Sci., vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1179-1193, Dec. 1969.
8. J. W. Eberle, "An adaptively phased, four-element array of thirty-foot parabolic reflectors for passive (echo) communication systems," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. AP-12, pp. 169-176, Mar. 1964.
9. J. K. Dempsey, W. Mullins, R. D. Barber, D. L. Losh, A. M. Bhanjo, and R. M. Dickinson, "A high-power phased array transmitter facility," in Proc. 7th Nat. Conf. High-Power Microwave Technol., Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, Oct. 31-Nov. 4, 1994.
10. G. J. Friedman, "Risk management applied to planetary defense," IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 33, pp. 721-733, Apr. 1997.
11. D. K. Barton, Modern Radar System Analysis.Norwood, MA: Artech House, 1988.
12. W. L. Flock, "Propagation effects on satellites systems at frequencies below 10 GHz," NASA Ref. Publ. 1108, Washington, DC, 1983.
13. P. A. Kalata, "The tracking index: A generalized parameter for a-b and a-b-g target trackers," IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. AES-20, pp. 174-182, Mar. 1984.