1 June 1998
Source: http://www.ntk.net/fipr/
Thanks to Danny O'Brien

    Subject: URGENT: press release - FIPR
    Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 16:52:16 +0100
    From: Ross Anderson

        Title: New Independent Research Foundation Backed by Microsoft

                    Embargoed until 11.00 Friday 29th May

    Too often, policy issues relating to information technology are
    seperately debated by two distinct grouups: technology experts and
    those focused on social concerns.  Policy makers face the challenge of
    reconciling the seperate debates in areas where technology is often
    evolving very quickly. A new research foundation aims to provide clear
    advice that spans this gap and is independent of vested interests.

    The Foundation for Information Policy Research will fund research into
    how information technology affects society. It is launched at a press
    conference on Friday 29th May at 11.00 am. (1)

    Microsoft has contributed a six-figure sum to cover the launch costs.
    Internet service providers Poptel and Demon are also supporting the
    Foundation. Its independence will be guaranteed, however, by a board
    of trustees. (2) In the medium term it will be supported by
    subscriptions from a range of firms in commerce and industry.

    The goal of the Foundation is to promote research and understanding of
    the effects, and the likely future effects, of IT on society. Its
    areas of investigation include: (3)

     * the regulation of electronic commerce;
     * consumer protection;
     * data protection and privacy;
     * copyright;
     * law enforcement;
     * evidence and archiving;
     * electronic interaction between government, businesses and individuals;
     * the extent to which various information technologies discriminate
       against the less advantaged members of society; and
     * the new risks that computer and communication systems pose to
       life, health and economic well-being

    The Foundation will also provide a valuable resource for the press as
    it will be able to put journalists in touch with a wide range of
    experts who can explain IT issues as they arise.

    Contact: Caspar Bowden (Director of the Foundation) 0171 837 8706
             Ross Anderson (Chair of the Foundation)    01223 334733

    QUOTES

    The Director of the Foundation, Caspar Bowden, said: ``The IT policies
    (and failures) which the current government inherited, and the
    decisions which will be made by them in the future, will have
    far-reaching effects on who society's winners and losers will be.  We
    have a duty to prevent technological innovation and development taking
    place at the expense of the poor, the old, the sick and the disabled.
    We believe that so long as we understand the social and policy
    implications of new technical innovations, we can make IT into a means
    to facilitate social inclusion. The Foundation's mission will be to
    achieve and to spread that understanding.''

    The Managing Director of Microsoft UK, David Svendsen, said: ``It's
    important that we contribute to a broad and informed public discussion
    on these information society issues.''

    The Chair of the Foundation, Ross Anderson of Cambridge University,
    said: ``We welcome this new source of funding for IT related
    research. An increase in the diversity of funding sources is almost
    always a good thing, and the Foundation will be particularly valuable
    as much of the available IT funding is directed to very short-term and
    narrowly technical agendas.''

    NOTES

    (1) The press conference is at the "Scrambling for Safety"
    conference, at the Bloomsbury Theatre, University College, London.
    URL: <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/rja14/sfs98.html>

    (2) The Foundation's Director and full-time CEO, Caspar Bowden, has
    for the last three years been running Qualia, a consultancy business
    specialising in internet implementations. Before that he was a
    financial strategist with Goldman Sachs. He also researched IT and
    communications issues for Scientists for Labour.

    Its chair, Ross Anderson, is a faculty member at Cambridge University
    Computer Laboratory and has done extensive research on topics related
    to electronic commerce.

    BACKGROUND

    The "Millennium Bug" - the problem that many computers cannot deal
    correctly with the date roll-over from 1999 to 2000 - threatens to
    cause havoc with many systems and has been declared a national
    emergency by the Prime Minister.

    Another problem that has worried policymakers and concerned citizens
    is that new developments in IT may discriminate against the less well
    off members of society.  For example, the current mechanisms for
    electronic commerce depend on consumers using their credit cards to
    order goods and services over the net. They often get a big discount
    for buying this way; but people without credit cards may lose out.

    The first task that the Foundation has set itself is to examine the
    underpinnings of electronic commerce. The European Commission has
    recently published a draft Directive on this subject and will launch a
    period of public consultation at the same conference at which the
    Foundation itself will be launched. (The draft directive is at
    <http://www.ispo.cec.be/eif/policy/>.)

    Other topics which the Foundation plans to investigate include:

    * the maintenance of public records in electronic form. We do not
     fully understand how to ensure that word processor files and other
     electronic documents created today can be safely stored for many
     years, and reliably made available in the future. This affects not
     just the new Freedom of Information Act, but also the work of future
     librarians and historians.

    * the development of copyright law. There are some industry proposals
     which would restrict the ability of libraries to lend out digital
     works. Will this mean the end of the public library, as more and more
     books, videos and other material become digital? What are the
     implications for schools and universities? What are the implications
     for the public, if all major sports events in future are pay-per-view?
     Are these developments inevitable, or is there something we can do
     about them?

    * the introduction of electronic communication between the citizen and
     the government has the potential to cut queues and the frustration of
     dealing with people on the phone. However, are these changes
     intrinsically more likely to favour the articulate, and to bring the
     most benefit to well-off people with their own computers? What
     technical developments are reasonably possible to ensure that all
     citizens get a fair deal?

    * the previous government's proposal for a "personal signature card"
     that would give access to all government services had a distinct
     flavour of an ID card. Are such developments necessary, or can we
     find workable alternatives?

    * the police are concerned about the spread of prepaid mobile phones,
     which are increasingly used by stalkers and extortionists. However, if
     they are banned, then how would people without credit cards obtain a
     mobile phone service?

    * there have been many disputes in the past over "phantom withdrawals"
     from bank cash machines, and banks have defended themselves by
     claiming that their computers cannot be wrong. How can this approach
     work when millions of merchants are selling services through a wide
     variety of computer systems? What will consumer rights amount to in
     the information age?

    * the failure of government computer systems - whether spectacular
     failure due to the millennium bug, or the continuing sporadic
     failures in the NHS - does most harm to pensioners, the disabled,
     single mothers, the unemployed and people on NHS waiting lists (who
     are typically elderly, female and working class). How can we
     encourage best engineering practice in the public sector?

    - - - ends - -

    Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 18:25:50 +0100
    From: "Danny O'Brien" <danny@spesh.com>
    To: ukcrypto@maillist.ox.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Scrambling for Safety

    At the risk of breaching copyright:

    <http://www.ntk.net/fipr/>

    d.

    On Mon, Jun 01, 1998 at 05:55:37PM +0100, Steve Mynott wrote:
    > http://www.fipr.org/ is blank :-)
    >
    > but its registered to
    >
    > Foundation For Policy Research (FIPR-DOM)
    > Gateway House, 322 Regents Park Rd
    > London, N3 2QQ
    > UK
    >
    > On Mon, Jun 01, 1998 at 05:47:37PM +0100, Mike Bracken wrote:
    > > http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/12624.html
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From:	Dr Alan Hassey [SMTP:alan@hassey.demon.co.uk]
    > > Sent:	Monday, June 01, 1998 4:52 PM
    > > To:	ukcrypto@maillist.ox.ac.uk
    > > Subject:	RE: Scrambling for Safety
    > >
    > > Can someone explain FIPR please?
    > > >My personal recollection of the high points was:
    > > >
    > > >* Seeing Ross and Caspar announce FIPR