1998 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
Volume 46 Number 1, January 1998

On the Discretization of the Integral Equation Describing Scattering by Rough Conducting Surfaces

Page 150.

Abstract:

Numerical simulations of scattering from one-dimensional (1-D) randomly rough surfaces with Pierson-Moskowitz (P-M) spectra show that if the kernel (or propagator) matrix with zeros on its diagonal is used in the discretized magnetic field integral equation (MFIE), the results exhibit an excessive sensitivity to the current sampling interval, especially for backscattering at low-grazing angles (LGA's). Though the numerical results reported in this paper were obtained using the method of ordered multiple interactions (MOMI), a similar sampling interval sensitivity has been observed when a standard method of moments (MoM) technique is used to solve the MFIE. A subsequent analysis shows that the root of the problem lies in the correct discretization of the MFIE kernel. We found that the inclusion of terms proportional to the surface curvature (regarded by some authors as an additional correction) in the diagonal of the kernel matrix virtually eliminates this sampling sensitivity effect. By reviewing the discretization procedure for MFIE we show that these curvature terms indeed must be included in the diagonal in order for the propagator matrix to be represented properly. The recommended current sampling interval for scattering calculations with P-M surfaces is also given.

References

1. D. A. Kapp and G. S. Brown, "A new numerical method for rough surface scattering calculations," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 44, pp. 711-721, May 1996.
2. D. Holliday, L. L. DeRaad, and G. J. St-Cyr, "Forward-backward: A new method for computing low-grazing angle scattering," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 44, pp. 722-729, May 1996.
3. D. A. Kapp, "A new method to calculate wave scattering from rough surfaces at low grazing angles," Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. State Univ., 1995.
4. G. S. Brown and D. A. Kapp, "The effect of surface curvature on the sampling interval and convergence rate of the method of ordered multiple interactions," presented at APS/URSI Symp., Baltimore, MD, July 1996; abstract URSI Dig. USNC/URSI Radio Sci. Meet., Baltimore, MD, 1996, p. 144.
5. N. Morita, N. Kumagi, and J. Mautz, Integral Equation Methods for Electromagnetics.Boston, MA: Artech, 1990, pp. 131-134.
6. E. Thorsos, "The validity of the Kirchhoff approximation for rough surface scattering using a Gaussian roughness spectrum," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 78-92, Jan. 1988.
7. E. Thorsos, "Acoustic scattering from `Pierson-Moskowitz' sea surface," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 335-349, July 1990.
8. R. Harrington, Field Computation by Moment Methods.New York: IEEE Press, 1993.
9. D. Middleton, An Introduction to Statistical Communication Theory.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960, pp. 210-212.