1998 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
Volume 46 Number 11, November 1998

Table of Contents for this issue

Complete paper in PDF format

Electrostatic Solution for Three-Dimensional Arbitrarily Shaped Conducting Bodies Using Finite Element and Measured Equation of Invariance

John H. Henderson and Sadasiva M. Rao

Page 1660.

Abstract:

Differential equation techniques such as finite element (FE) and finite difference (FD) have the advantage of sparse system matrices that have relatively small memory requirements for storage and relatively short central processing unit (CPU) time requirements for solving. However, these techniques do not lend themselves as readily for use in open-region problems as the method of moments (MoM) because they require the discretization of the space surrounding the object where MoM only requires discretization of the surface of the object. In this work, a relatively new mesh truncation method known as the measured equation of invariance (MEI) is investigated augmenting the FE method for the solution of electrostatic problems involving three-dimensional (3-D) arbitrarily shaped conducting objects. This technique allows truncation of the mesh as close as two node layers from the object. MEI views sparse-matrix numerical techniques as methods of determining weighting coefficients between neighboring nodes and finds those weights for nodes on the boundary of the mesh by assuming viable charge distributions on the surface of the object and using Green's function to measure the potentials at the nodes. Problems in the implementation of FE/MEI are discussed and the method is compared against MoM for a cube and a sphere.

References

  1. R. F. Harrington, Field Computation by Moment Methods.New York: Macmillan, 1968.
  2. J. Jin, The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics.New York: Wiley, 1993.
  3. A. Bayliss, M. Gunzburger, and E. Turkel, "Boundary conditions for the numerical solution of elliptic equations in exterior regions," SIAM J. Appl. Math., vol. 42, pp. 430-451, Apr. 1982.
  4. P. P. Silvester and M. S. Hsieh, "Finite element solution of two-dimensional exterior field problems," Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng., vol. 118, pp. 1743-1747, Dec. 1971.
  5. B. H. McDonald and A. Wexler, "Finite element solution of unbounded field problems," IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-20, pp. 841-847, Dec. 1972.
  6. K. K. Mei, R. Pous, Z. Chen, Y. W. Liu, and M. D. Prouty, "Measured equation of invariance: A new concept in field computation," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 42, pp. 320-327, Mar. 1994.
  7. R. Pous, The Measured Equation of Inavariance: A News Concept in Field Computation, Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. California, Berkeley, 1992.
  8. A. C. Cangellaris and D. B. Wright, "Application of the measured equation of invariance to electromagnetic scattering by penetrable bodies," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 29, pp. 1628-1631, Mar. 1993.
  9. J. O. Jetvic and R. Lee, "A theoretical and numerical analysis of the measured equation of invariance," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 42, pp. 1097-1105, Aug. 1994.
  10. J. O. Jetvic, "An analysis of measured equation of invariance," Master's thesis, Ohio State Univ., Columbus, 1994.
  11. G. K. Gothard, S. M. Rao, T. K. Sarkar, and M. S. Palma, "Finite-element solution of open region electrostatic problems incorporating the measured equation of invariance," IEEE Microwave Guided Wave Lett., vol. 5, pp. 252-254, Aug. 1995.
  12. G. K. Gothard, "The two-dimensional finite integral technique combined with the measured equation of invariance applied to open region problems," Ph.D. dissertation, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL, Dec. 1995.
  13. J. O. Jetvic and R. Lee, "An analytical characterization of the error in the measured equation of invariance," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 43, pp. 1109-1115, Oct. 1995.
  14. --, "How invariant is the measured equation of invariance?," IEEE Microwave Guided Wave Lett., vol. 5, pp. 45-47, Feb. 1995.
  15. K. K. Mei, "Comments on "How invariant is the measured equation of invariance?," IEEE Microwave Guided Wave Lett., vol. 5, pp. 417, Nov. 1995.
  16. K. K. Mei, Y. Liu, J. O. Jetvic, and R. Lee, "Comments on `A theoretical and numerical analysis of the measured equation of invariance,'" IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 43, pp. 1168-1171, Oct. 1995.
  17. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing.Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992.
  18. G. H. Golub and C, F. van Loan, Matrix Computations.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1989.
  19. D. R. Wilton and J. E. Wheeler, "Comparison of convergence rates of the conjugate gradients method applied to various integral equation formulations," Tech. Rep. 87-16, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, 1987.
  20. S. M. Rao, A. W. Glisson, D. R. Wilton, and B. S. Vidula, "A simple numerical solution procedure for statics problems involving arbitrary shaped surfaces," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. AP-27, pp. 604-608, Sept. 1979.