1999 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
Volume 47 Number 4, April 1999

On the Use of Finite Surfaces in the Numerical Prediction of Rough Surface Scattering

Page 600.

Abstract:

Method of moments (MOM)-based Monte Carlo calculations are widely used in determining the average radar cross section of randomly rough surfaces. It is desirable in these numerical calculations to truncate the scattering surface into as short a length as possible to minimize the solution time. However, truncating the surface tends to change the solution for the surface fields near the truncation points and may alter the scattered far fields. In this paper, these end effect errors are examined for one-dimensional (i.e., grooved or corduroy) surfaces which are Gaussian distributed in height and have either a Gaussian or a Pierson-Moskowitz spectra. In the case of the Pierson-Moskowitz type surface, it is shown that a relatively short surface of 80-120 wavelengths can be used to obtain the average backscattered radar cross section for backscattering angles as large as 60° from normal. For a comparatively smooth Gaussian surface, on the other hand, its is shown that the truncation effects can be very significant at moderate backscattering angles. Also, great care should be taken when examining the scattering from Gaussian surfaces which are dominated by specular scattering. It is shown that in this situation, a very large number of calculations may be needed to obtain a good numerical average.

References

1. P. Cao and S. Macaskill, "Iterative techniques for rough surface scattering problems," Wave Motion, vol. 21, p. 209.
2. K. Fung and M. F. Chen, "Numerical simulations of scattering from simple and composite random surfaces," J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A, vol. 2, no. 12, p. 2274.
3. D. A. Kapp and G. S. Brown, "A new numerical method for rough-surface scattering calculations," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 45, p. 711.
4. Y. Kim, E. Rodriguez, and S. L. Durden, "A numerical assessment of rough surface scattering theories: Horizontal polarization," Radio Sci., vol. 27, no. 4, p. 497.
5. --, "A numerical assessment of rough surface scattering theories: Vertical polarization," Radio Sci., vol. 27 no. 4, p. 515.
6. A. A. Maradudin, E. R. Mendez, and T. Michel, "Backscattering effects in the elastic scattering of p-polarized light from a large-amplitude random metallic grating," Opt. Lett., vol. 14, no. 3. p. 151, 1989.
7. R. T. Marchand, "A numerical study on the validity of the quasispecular and two-scale models for rough surface parameter estimation: One dimensional surfaces," Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Tech, 1997.
8. M. Nieto-Vesperians, Scattering and Diffraction in Physical Optics.New York: Wiley, 1991.
9. C. L. Rino and H. D. Ngo, "Forward propagation in a half-space with and irregular boundary," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 45, p. 1340, 1997.
10. E. I. Thorsos, "The validity of the Kirchhoff approximation for rough surface scattering using a Gaussian roughness spectrum," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 83, p. 78, 1988.
11. --, "Acoustic scattering from a `Pierson-Moskowitz' sea spectrum," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 88, no. 1, p. 335, 1990.
12. J. V. Toporkov, R. T. Marchand, and G. S. Brown, "On the discretization of the integral equation describing scattering by rough conducting surfaces," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 46, p. 150, 1998.