1999 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
Volume 47 Number 4, April 1999

Table of Contents for this issue

Complete paper in PDF format

Design and Analysis of a 2-D Eigenspace-Based Interference Canceller

Cheng-Chou Lee and Ju-Hong Lee, Member, IEEE

Page 733.

Abstract:

This paper deals with the problem of eigenspace-based interference cancellation using a two-dimensional (2-D) rectangular array. An efficient 2-D signal blocking technique is presented to remove the desired signal from the received array data. In conjunction with the 2-D signal blocking technique, a positive definite matrix is further constructed and used to compensate the effect of the signal blocking operation on the sensor noise received by a 2-D eigenspace-based interference canceller (EIC). Therefore, the interference subspace required for computing the optimal weight vector of the designed 2-D EIC can be obtained by simply using conventional eigenvalue decomposition methods instead of any complicated generalized eigenvalue decomposition methods. The performances of the designed 2-D EIC under finite samples and steering angle error are also evaluated. The developed theoretical results are confirmed by several simulation examples.

References

  1. M. G. Amin, "Concurrent nulling and locations of multiple interference in adaptive antenna arrays," IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 40, pp. 2658-2663, Nov. 1992.
  2. H. Subbaram and K. Abend, "Interference suppression via orthogonal projections: A performance analysis," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 41, pp. 1187-1193, Sept. 1993.
  3. B. Friedlander, "A signal subspace method for adaptive interference cancellation," IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. 36, pp. 1835-1845, Dec. 1988.
  4. A. M. Haimovich and Y. Bar-Ness, "An eigenanalysis interference canceler," IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 39, pp. 76-84, Jan. 1991.
  5. Y. Bressler, V. U. Reddy, and T. Kailath, "Optimum beamforming for coherent signals and interference," IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. 36, pp. 833-842, June 1988.
  6. K. Ohnishi and R. T. Milton, "A new optimization technique for adaptive antenna arrays," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 41, pp. 525-532, May 1993.
  7. A. Graham, Kronecker Products and Matrix Calculus with Applications.New York: Ellis Horwood, 1981.
  8. J. E. Hudson, Adaptive Array Principles.New York: Peter Peregrinus, 1981.
  9. F. Li and R. J. Vaccaro, "Unified analysis for DOA estimation algorithms in array signal processing," Signal Processing,vol. 25, pp. 147-169, Nov. 1991.
  10. M. Kaveh and A. J. Barabell, "The statistical performance of the MUSIC and minimum-norm algorithms in resolving plane waves in noise," IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-34, pp. 331-341, Apr. 1986.
  11. M. Wax and T. Kailath, "Detection of signals by information theoretic criteria," IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-33, pp. 387-392, Apr. 1985.
  12. P. Stoica, "On estimating the noise power in array processing," Signal Processing, vol. 26, pp. 205-220, Feb. 1992.