1999 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
Volume 47 Number 7, July 1999

Differences Between the Narrow-Angle and Wide-Angle Propagators in the Split-Step Fourier Solution of the Parabolic Wave Equation

Page 1131.

Abstract:

For tropospheric electromagnetic propagation,Maxwell's equations can be reduced to a parabolic wave equation, which is solved by marching over range steps. In each step, the solution is split into a product of three operators. The first and third account for atmospheric and surface variation, while the center operator propagates the field as though in vacuum. This center operator is the object of interest here. Older versions of the method used the narrow-angle propagator, while some recent versions use the wide-angle propagator. It was thought that the wide-angle propagator was entirely superior to the narrow-angle propagator, but some artifacts observed in recent experiments have led to the present investigation. The two propagators are examined numerically and analytically and found to exhibit subtle differences at large angles from the horizontal. This has required modifications to the way in which sources are created for starting the split-step solution. The narrow- and wide-angle propagators are also compared on two problems with analytic solutions to quantify the improvement of the wide-angle over the narrow-angle

References

1. J. R. Kuttler and G. D. Dockery, "Theoretical description of the parabolic approximation/Fourier split-step method of representing electromagnetic propagation in the troposphere," Radio Sci., vol. 26, pp. 381-393, 1991.
2. G. D. Dockery and J. R. Kuttler, "An improved impedance boundary algorithm for Fourier split-step solutions of the parabolic wave equation," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 44, pp. 1592-1599, Dec. 1996.
3. D. J. Donohue and J. R. Kuttler, "Modeling radar propagation over terrain," Johns Hopkins APL Tech. Dig., vol. 18, pp. 279-287, 1997.
4. --, "Propagation modeling over terrain using the parabolic wave equation," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., to be published.
5. M. D. Feit and J. A. Fleck, "Light propagation in graded-index optical fibers," Appl. Opt., vol. 17, pp. 3990-3998, 1978.
6. D. J. Thomson and N. R. Chapman, "A wide-angle split-step algorithm for the parabolic equation," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 74, pp. 1848-1854, 1983.
7. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions.Washington, DC: Nat. Bureau Standards, 1964.
8. H. S. Carslaw and J. C. Jaeger, Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd ed.New York: Oxford, 1959.
9. P. M. Morse and H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1953.
10. N. W. McLachlan, Bessel Functions for Engineers, 2nd ed.New York: Oxford, 1955.
11. H. Bateman, Tables of Integral Tranforms.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954, vol. I.
12. C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory.New York: Harper Row, 1982.
13. D. E. Kerr, Propagation of Short Radio Waves.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1951.
14. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 2nd ed.New York: Macmillan, 1964.
15. J. R. Kuttler and J. D. Huffaker, "Solving the parabolic wave equation with a rough surface boundary condition," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 94 , pp. 2451-2454, 1993.