1999 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
Volume 47 Number 11, November 1999

Bistatic RCS Calculations with the Vector Parabolic Equation Method

Page 1688.

Abstract:

The vector parabolic equation (PE) method provides accurate solutions for electromagnetic scattering from three-dimensional (3-D) objects ranging from a size comparable to the wavelength of the incident wave to several tens of wavelengths. A paraxial version of Maxwell's equations is solved with a marching solution that only requires limited computing resources, even for large scatterers. By decoupling the PE paraxial direction from the direction of incidence, the bistatic radar cross section (RCS) can be computed at all scattering angles. A sparse-matrix formulation is used to implement electromagnetic boundary conditions, ensuring that polarization effects are treated fully. Computing costs are kept to a minimum through the use of a double-pass method so that calculations can be carried out on a desktop computer for realistic targets and radar frequencies. The method has been validated on simple canonical shapes and tested on complex targets.

References

1. G. D. Dockery and J. R. Kuttler, "An improved impedance-boundary algorithm for Fourier split-step solutions of the parabolic wave equation," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 44, pp. 1592-1599, Dec. 1996.
2. F. B. Jensen, W. A. Kuperman, M. B. Porter, and H. Schmidt, Computational Acoustics.New York: AIP, 1994.
3. M. F. Levy and P.-P. Borsboom, "Radar cross-section computations using the parabolic equation method," Electron. Lett., vol. 32, pp. 1234-1236, June 1996.
4. M. F. Levy, P.-P. Borsboom, A. A. Zaporozhets, and A. Zebic-Le Hyaric, "RCS calculations with the parabolic wave equation," AGARD Conf. Proc., Ankara, Turkey, Oct. 1996, no. 583, pp. 5.1-5.9.
5. M. F. Levy and A. A. Zaporozhets, "Target scattering calculations with the parabolic equation method," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 103, pp. 735-741, Feb. 1998.
6. K. R. Umashankar, "Numerical analysis of electromagnetic wave scattering and interaction based on frequency domain integral equation and method of moments technique," Wave Motion, vol. 10, pp. 493-525, Dec. 1988.
7. A. Taflove, Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time Domain Method.Boston, MA: Artech House, 1995.
8. M. Domingo, R. P. Torres, and M. F. Catedra, "Calculation of the RCS from the interaction of edges and facets," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 42, pp. 885-888, June 1994.
9. M. D. Collins, "A split-step Pade solution for the parabolic equation method," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 94, pp. 1736-1742, Apr. 1993.
10. J.-P. Berenger, "A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves," J. Comput. Phys., vol. 114, pp. 185-200, Oct. 1994.
11. C. Vassalo and F. Collino, "Highly efficient absorbing boundary conditions for the beam-propagation method," J. Lightwave Technol., vol 14, pp. 1570-1577, June 1996.
12. J. J. Bowman, T. B. A. Senior, and P. L. E. Uslenghi, Electromagnetic Scattering by Simple Shapes.New York: Hemisphere, 1987 (revised ed).
13. H. T. G. Woo, M. J. Schuh, and M. L. Sanders, "Benchmark radar targets for the validation of computational electromagnetics programs," IEEE Antennas Propagat. Mag., vol. 35, pp. 84-89, Feb. 1993.
14. A. A. Zaporozhets and M. F. Levy, "Radar cross section calculation with marching methods," Electron. Lett., vol. 34, no. 20, pp. 1971-1972, 1998.
15. --, "Current marching technique for electromagnetic scattering computations," IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat, vol. 47, pp. 1016-1024, June 1999.
16. M. D. Collins and M. F. Werby, "A parabolic equation model for scattering in the ocean," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 85, pp. 1895-1902, May 1989.