1999 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
Volume 47 Number 11, November 1999

Theoretical Performance Limits on Tropospheric Refractivity Estimation Using Point-to-Point Microwave Measurements

Page 1727.

Abstract:

Ducted propagation above the ocean surface can seriously impact shipboard radar and communications. Point-to-point microwave measurements have been proposed as a means of estimating tropospheric refractivity for the purposes of characterizing surface-based ducts. This paper addresses the theoretical performance of refractivity estimates that can be made by combining field measurements at different frequencies with prior statistics of refractivity variation. Parameterizing the refractivity profile using empirical orthogonal functions derived from a historical database, both Cramer-Rao performance bounds and the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate are discussed using coherent or incoherent signals. Results obtained using a realistic model of refractivity conditions off Southern California suggest that multifrequency propagation measurements can significantly improve the estimation of refractivity and propagation loss profiles.

References

1. B. Z. Bobrovsky, E. Mayer-Wolf, and M. Zakai, "Some classes of global Cramer-Rao bounds," Ann. Stat., vol. 15, pp. 1421-1438, 1987.
2. H. V. Hitney, "Refractive effects from VHF to EHF--Part A: Propagation mechanism," AGARD Lecture Ser. 196, Sept. 1994.
3. --, "Hybrid ray optics and parabolic equation methods for radar propagation modeling," in Radar '92 Conf., Oct. 1992, pub. 365, pp. 58-61.
4. D. E. Kerr, Propagation of Short Radio Waves.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1951.
5. L. R. LeBlanc and F. H. Middleton, "An underwater acoustic sound velocity data model," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 67, pp. 2055-2062, 1980.
6. S. Li and P. M. Schultheiss, "Depth measurement of remote sources using multipath propagation," IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., vol. 18, pp. 379-387, July 1993.
7. S. Narasimhan and J. L. Krolik, "Fundamental limits on acoustic source range estimation performance in uncertain ocean channels," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 215-226, 1995.
8. I. Reuven and H. Messer, "A Barankin-type lower bound on the estimation error of a hybrid parameter vector," IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 43, pp. 1084-1093, May 1997.
9. Y. Rockah and P. M. Schultheiss, "Array shape calibration using sources in unknown locations. I. Far-field sources, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-35, pp. 286-299, Mar. 1987.
10. T. Rogers, "Effects of the variability of atmospheric refractivity on propagation estimates," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. AP-44, pp. 460-465, Apr. 1996.
11. H. L. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation and Modulation Theory.New York: Wiley, 1968.
12. A. Weiss and E. Weinstein, "A lower bound on the mean square error in random parameter estimation," IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 31, pp. 680-682, 1985.
13. R. A. Paulus, "An experiment in variability of coastal atmospheric refractivity," Proc. Int. Geosci. Remote Sensing Symp. (IGRASS), Aug. 1994, vol. 1, pp. 386-388.
14. J. Ziv and M. Zakai, "Some lower bounds on signal parameter estimation," IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-15, pp. 386-391, May 1969.