2000 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
Volume 48 Number 9, September 2000

Table of Contents for this issue

Complete paper in PDF format

On the Design of NMR Sensor for Well-Logging Applications

Jaideva C. Goswami, Senior Member, IEEE Apo Sezginer, Senior Member, IEEE and Bruno Luong

Page 1393.

Abstract:

The magnetic fields of antenna and magnet used in inside-out nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) well-logging tool are computed using a finite-element method (FEM). A typical operating frequency of such tools is 2 MHz, at which the skin depth is about 47 µm for copper conductor. A direct application of FEM to evaluate power loss at such frequency,therefore, requires very fine discretization of the conductors, which, in turn, makes the problem numerically ill-conditioned. A perturbation technique along with FEM is used to evaluate the power loss in conductors that avoids the need for small discretization steps along the conductor thickness. The design of the magnet, on the other hand, is complicated by the fact that the model is nonlinear in nature because of the presence of ferrites and steel materials surrounding the magnet and because the size of the problem is usually quite large; quarter of a million unknowns is fairly common. A typical nonlinear FEM model requires about 35 h of central processing unit (CPU) time on a Sun Ultra 60 296 MHz workstation with one gigabyte of RAM. The magnet is built by stacking several magnet segments along the axial direction and the objective of the design is to magnetize these segments in such a way so as to produce a desired field profile in front of the magnet. It generally requires many executions of the nonlinear FEM model. An optimal control technique is used in conjunction with the FEM to speed up the design process. Very good agreement between the measured and computed antenna efficiency and magnetic field is obtained thus validating the numerical model.

References

  1. R. K. Cooper and J. A. Jackson, "Remote (inside-out) NMR: Part I-Remote production of homogeneous magnetic field", J. Magn. Resonanace, vol. 41, pp.  400-405, 1980.
  2. L. J. Burnett and J. A. Jackson, "Remote (inside-out) NMR: Part II-Sensitivity of NMR detection for external samples", J. Magn. Resonance, vol. 41, pp.  406-410,  1980.
  3. J. A. Jackson, L. J. Burnett and J. F. Harmon, "Remote (inside-out) NMR: Part III-Detection of nuclear magnetic resonance in a remotely produced region of homogeneous magnetic field", J. Magn. Resonance, vol. 41, pp.  411-421, 1980.
  4. H. Clow, W. S. Percival and P. E. Walters, "Nuclear magnetic logging", U.S. Patent 4 629 986, Dec. 1986.
  5. S. Strikman, "Nuclear magnetic resonance sensing apparatus and techniques", U.S. Patent 4 710 713, Dec. 1987.
  6. Z. Taicher, S. Strikman and M. Shporer, "Nuclear magnetic resonance sensing apparatus and techniques", Jan. 1988.
  7. R. L. Kleinberg, D. D. Griffin, M. Fukuhara, A. Sezginer and W. C. Chew, "Borehole measurement of nmr characteristics of earth formations", Oct. 1991.
  8. R. L. Kleinberg, A. Sezginer, D. D. Griffin and M. Fukuhara, "Novel NMR apparatus for investigating an external sample", J. Magn. Resonance, vol. 97, pp.  466-485, 1992.
  9. A. Sezginer, D. D. Griffin, R. L. Kleinberg, M. Fukuhara and D. G. Dudley, "RF sensor of a novel NMR apparatus", J. Electromagn. Waves Applicat., vol. 7, pp.  13-30, 1993.
  10. T. C. Farrar and E. D. Becker, Pulse and Fourier Transform NMR, New York: Academic, 1971.
  11. Z. H. Cho, H. S. Kim, H. B. Song and J. Cumming, "Fourier transform nuclear magnetic resonance tomographic imaging", Proc. IEEE, vol. 70, pp.  1152 -1173, 1982.
  12. W. S. Hinshaw and A. H. Lent, "An introduction to NMR imaging: From the Bloch equation to the imaging equation", Proc. IEEE, vol. 71, pp.  338-350,  1983.
  13. R. L. Kleinberg, W. E. Kenyon and P. P. Mitra, "Mechanism of NMR relaxation of fluids in rock", J. Magn. Resonance, vol. 108, pp.  206-214, 1994.
  14. H. Y. Carr and E. M. Purcell, "Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments", Phys. Rev., vol. 94, pp.  630-638,  1954.
  15. S. Meiboom and D. Gill, "Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times", Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 29, pp.  688-691, 1958.
  16. R. Plonsey and R. E. Collin, Principles and Applications of Electromagnetic Fields , New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973, p.  368. 
  17. B. Luong, J. C. Goswami, A. Sezginer and D. Davies, "An optimal control technique for magnet design in inside-out NMR", IEEE Trans. Magn., to be published.